Beast
By Ajay Mishra, Team BeastBrowser · Updated 2 November 2026
Disclosure: we make BeastBrowser, so this is our own comparison — but every Kameleo number below is from public pricing summaries checked on 2 November 2026. Kameleo prices are in euros, BeastBrowser's in US dollars. Re-check Kameleo's official pricing page before you buy, because plans change.
The short answer
If you run many browsers at the same time, BeastBrowser's flat $30/mo wins — there is no concurrency meter to watch. If you keep a huge library of stored profiles but only run a few at once, Kameleo's model can be cheaper, and its developer tooling is genuinely deeper. Count your concurrent browsers first; that one number decides this comparison.
Quick verdict
Choose BeastBrowser if you run many browsers at the same time and hate concurrency metering — $30 flat, no per-slot math, RPA recorder and proxy store included. Choose Kameleo if you're a developer who needs SDKs, Docker, and headless automation, or you keep a huge library of stored profiles but only run a few at once — its profiles are unlimited on every plan, including free.
The master table
| Tool | From | Free plan | Paid profiles | RPA | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BeastBrowser | $30/mo flat | Yes, always — no credit card, 5 local profiles/day | Unlimited on Premium | Included (recorder) | 24/7 WhatsApp human (+91) |
| Kameleo | €59/mo (Startup) | Yes — 2 concurrent, 300 min/mo | Unlimited stored (all plans) | API/SDKs included | Support Center + docs |
Price comparison: the billing models are opposites
This is the most important thing to understand: Kameleo bills concurrent browser slots, not profiles. Stored profiles are unlimited on every plan — even free. So the comparison depends entirely on how many browsers you run at the same time.
| BeastBrowser | Kameleo | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $30/mo flat | €59/mo monthly (Startup); ~€45/mo billed annually |
| Free plan | Yes, always — no credit card, 5 local profiles/day | Yes — 2 concurrent browsers, 300 min/mo, 100 cloud profiles, unlimited local profiles |
| 10 concurrent browsers | $30 flat | €59/mo (Startup) |
| 100 concurrent browsers | $30 flat | €299/mo (Business) |
| 1,000 concurrent browsers | $30 flat | €1,499/mo (Enterprise) |
Honest nuance the other way: if you store 500 profiles but only ever run 3 at once, Kameleo's free tier or €59 Startup covers you — that's genuinely cheaper than any flat plan. The killer angle only bites when concurrency grows: 10 browsers at once costs €59/mo on Kameleo vs $30 flat on BeastBrowser, and there's no ceiling to worry about.
How I counted the cost
I run my own check the same way every time: open the number of browsers I actually use in a normal hour, not the number of profiles I own. A profile library of 200 with 8 browsers open at once is an 8-concurrent workload, not a 200-profile one. On Kameleo that sits inside Startup at €59/mo; on BeastBrowser it sits inside the same $30 flat as 2 browsers or 50. Flip the shape — 500 stored profiles, 2 browsers open — and Kameleo's free tier does the job while BeastBrowser's free plan (5 local profiles/day) would not cover the library the same way. The workload shape, not the headline price, is the decision.
Feature comparison
| Feature | BeastBrowser | Kameleo |
|---|---|---|
| Fingerprinting | Per-profile isolated fingerprints | Strong masking incl. mobile emulation (2 emulated mobile browsers on free) |
| Proxies | Included: in-app proxy store + proxy manager | Bring-your-own (HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5/SSH per profile); no bundled traffic |
| RPA / automation | Included: visual RPA recorder, synchronizer, scheduler | Included: Local API + SDKs (Python/JS/C#), Selenium/Puppeteer/Playwright, Docker images, headless masking — the developer's choice |
| API / MCP | Included: local API + MCP server | Local API included (60–1200 req/min by plan) |
| Team seats | Team plan: seats, roles, audit log | Unlimited team members on paid plans (3 on free) |
| macOS | Apple Silicon build available (per beastbrowser.com) | Not stated on the pricing page we read |
| Android app | — | Android app + emulated mobile browsers |
Kameleo's genuine strengths: it's the most developer-friendly tool on this list — SDKs, Docker, headless mode with identical masking — and unlimited stored profiles on every plan is a pricing model nobody else offers. If your workflow is "thousands of profiles, a handful running," Kameleo is arguably underpriced.
Support comparison
| BeastBrowser | Kameleo | |
|---|---|---|
| Channel | 24/7 WhatsApp (human, +91) + live chat + email | Support Center (tickets), developer docs, knowledge base, video guides |
| Timezone fit | India-based — same timezone as Indian teams | EU-based vendor |
| Enterprise extra | — | Enterprise plan includes a 60-min CTO strategy session |
Which one I would pick
BeastBrowser is better if: you run 10+ browsers simultaneously; you want automation without writing code; you buy proxies regularly and want the store in-app; you want a human on WhatsApp instead of a ticket form.
Kameleo is better if: you're a developer building on SDKs/Docker/headless; you maintain a huge profile library with low concurrency; you need Android emulation depth; you want unlimited team members without a Team-plan upsell.
Migration: switching in 5 steps
- Export your proxy list from Kameleo's per-profile settings into a spreadsheet.
- Create a free BeastBrowser account (no credit card) and install the desktop app.
- Recreate your active profiles — start with the 10 you run concurrently; stored-but-idle ones can wait.
- Rebuild automations — API scripts mostly port over; no-code flows get rebuilt in the visual RPA recorder (usually faster the second time).
- Run both for two weeks on the free plan, then move the team and cancel Kameleo.
Try BeastBrowser free: download it from beastbrowser.com, create your first profiles with no credit card, and run your real concurrent workload for a week before you pay anything. If your concurrency stays under 3, Kameleo's free tier is a fair alternative — pick the one your workload actually fits.
FAQ
Is BeastBrowser really cheaper than Kameleo?
Depends on concurrency. At 10+ simultaneous browsers, yes — $30 flat vs €59+/mo (Kameleo prices last verified 2 November 2026). With 2–3 concurrent browsers and hundreds of stored profiles, Kameleo's lower tiers can be cheaper. Count your concurrent browsers, not your profiles.
Does BeastBrowser's free plan need a credit card?
No — free plan, no card, 5 local profiles/day.
I'm a developer — which automation is better?
Kameleo's SDKs, Docker images, and headless masking are deeper for code-first workflows. BeastBrowser's visual RPA recorder is faster if you'd rather not code. Different strengths, honest answer.
Can I use my own proxies with both?
Yes — both support HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5 per profile. BeastBrowser additionally sells proxies inside the app.
Where do I see BeastBrowser's current pricing?
On beastbrowser.com — $30/mo flat for Premium, $199/year, free plan with no card.
Your turn: how many browsers do you actually run at the same time — and what does that cost you per month? The concurrent number is the one that matters here.
Sources & Credits
BeastBrowser pricing and free plan (5 local profiles/day, no card; $30/mo flat; $199/year): beastbrowser.com and its public directory listings. Kameleo pricing ladder (Free €0 / Startup €59 / Business €299 / Enterprise €1,499, annual equivalents €45 / €225 / €1,125, concurrency 2 / 10 / 100 / 1,000, unlimited stored profiles): public pricing summaries checked 2 November 2026, cross-checked against the October 2026 draft — re-check Kameleo's official pricing page before buying. No other numbers in this post are sourced from third parties.
By Ajay Mishra, Team BeastBrowser
